consider statement-1 is a fallacy. statement-2 is a tautology

Question

Consider

Statement I (p ∧ ~ q) ∧ (~ P ∧ q) is a fallacy,

Statement II (p → q) ↔ (~ q → ~ p) is a tautology. 

(a) Statement I is true, Statement II is true; Statement II is a correct explanation for Statement I

(b) Statement I is true, Statement II is true; Statement II is not a correct explanation for Statement I

(c) Statement I is true, Statement II is false

(d) Statement I is false, Statement II is true

Answer 1

(b) Statement I is true, Statement II is true; Statement II is not a correct explanation for Statement I

Explanation:
Statement I and II are both true but, they are independent of each other and hence cannot be used to explain each other by simple transformations